Sunday, September 07, 2008

Adequate Compensation for Agricultural Land

There has been a great deal of furor in India over the acquisition of agricultural land for industrial development. All agree that it needs to be done and insist that farmers must be adequately compensated, none specify what that means. The state of West Bengal purchased 1,000 acres from over 13,000 farmers in 2006 at over Rs 1,000,000 per acre for the Tata car project. There have been numerous reports suggesting that this compensation is inadequate. The table below should allow readers to judge for themselves. The data here are about five years old. Since then the prices of agricultural products and inputs have increased dramatically. Doubling the annual cash flow shown below may reflect current conditions more accurately. The annual interest on a long-term deposit of Rs 1,000,000 is Rs 95,000 at current rates. Further, Tata has offered to employ the ‘dispossessed’ farmers. Wages from day-labour constitute a substantial part of the income of most Indian farmers (equal to income from farming in WB). This income is not shown below, since it will be a small fraction of what Tata is likely to pay, excluding benefits.

When the total return from owning and operating an asset is less than that from merely providing an equivalent amount of labour, the economic value of the asset becomes negative. This is the tragedy of agriculture in India, caused to a large extent by the inexorable shrinking of farm sizes.

Farming Household Income: Operational Holding Class - 0.4 to 1.0 Hectares

(Rupees per annum)

India

Punjab

UP

WB

TN

Average Size: All Rural Holdings

0.718

0.918

0.643

0.302

0.313

Average Size: Within Holding Class1

0.734

0.703

0.722

0.715

0.744

Cultivation:

Value of Output

Main Products

12,563

29,715

15,543

19,184

11,110

Byproducts

1,096

1,880

1,553

1,215

680

Total Value2

13,659

31,595

17,096

20,399

11,790

Expenses

Seeds

924

851

1,419

1,245

1,155

Pesticides, etc.

350

1,324

247

681

495

Fertilizer & Manure

1,414

2,156

2,080

2,263

1,420

Irrigation

741

1,406

1,614

1,306

483

Hired Labour

1,315

1,812

1,002

3,539

2,075

Other

1,177

3,132

1,806

1,461

1,163

Total Expenses2

5,921

10,681

8,168

10,495

6,791

Income from Cultivation

7,738

20,914

8,928

9,904

4,999

Expenditure on Farming Assets

1,920

7,308

1,944

792

2,484

Annual Cash Flow from Cultivation

5,818

13,606

6,984

9,112

2,515

Farm Animals:

Receipts2

7,116

26,604

8,244

3,708

5,808

Expenses2

6,012

23,772

7,608

2,784

4,476

Income from Farm Animals

1,104

2,832

636

924

1,332

Annual Cash Flow from Cultivation and Farm Animals

6,922

16,438

7,620

10,036

3,847

Implied Annual Cash Flow per Acre

3,819

9,463

4,274

5,684

2,093

1. Holding class for average size is 0.5 - 1.0 hectares. Hectare = 2.471 acres. Average size for all rural holdings reflects households with zero holding.

UP = Uttar Pradesh, WB = West Bengal, TN = Tamil Nadu (no glacier-fed rivers).

2. Value includes imputed value of output consumed by the household. So do farming expenses.

Source: NSSO reports 492 (Jan-Dec 2003) & 497 (July 2002 – June 2003), available online.

Labels: , ,


This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Subscribe to Posts [Atom]